**This assignment is a short case analysis of Henry Tam and the MGI Team (HBS case). Please respond to the following questions for the case analysis. You will be graded on your application of the readings to your response to the following questions. Be sure to include concrete examples from the case and support from readings for your arguments.
**Of the three approaches to resolve team conflict (Garvin and Roberto; Eisenhardt, Kahwajy, and Bourgeois III; and Edmondson and Smith), which should your selected leader use to resolve conflict(s) to complete the proposal on time? Be sure to explain why he should use this approach vs. the other approaches. (This means you need to briefly explain why the other approaches to resolve team conflict were not chosen.)
**The selected leader will be Henry Tam, and using approaches in the case of “How Management Team Can Have a Good Fight”. Follow the above instruction.
**Please only use quotes from these three cases:
• How Management Teams Can Have a Good Fight
• How to Manage Relationship Conflict
• What you Don’t Know about Making Decisions
***Please don’t spend too much on talking about the background of each person and the case. Go straight into the analysis part. Focus on the team conflict. Explain why the model/approach suggested by Eisenhardt, Kahwajy, and Bourgeois is the best approach to resolve this team conflict(s) to complete the proposal on time.